Ruse's

Perhaps Ruse's prediction about religious believers 'reactions to my approach is quite right.

Michael Ruse: The Quest For Inclusion in the Science and Religion Debate Michael Ruse 2010

If I give you Michael Ruse's phone number will you call him and just explain this to him?

Blurring the Line 2007

Full disclosure: I'm planning to write a review of it, as per Michael Ruse's request, and think I can do a better job of it with perspectives from both sides.

Books Most Important to You 2006

The fact that we are content to work with the religious, while many of the religious will not reciprocate that tolerance and even some of our fellow scientists want to hide us away, is a good example of who is holding the moral high ground here, and Ruse's condemnation is yet another reason why I don't hold much respect for the guy.

2006 February - Telic Thoughts 2006

In Ruse's terminology, evolution only gradually arose from pseudoscience, through popular science, before finally becoming a professional science in the 1930's.

On contradictory claims and the long history of teleology 2006

Dennett doesn't specify his cause of concern, but one could guess that it's Ruse's recent book, The Evolution-Creation Struggle, in which he claims that some (including Dennett) are using the scientific theory of evolution as a cover for an atheistic theology.

2006 February - Telic Thoughts 2006

In Ruse's terminology, evolution only gradually arose from pseudoscience, through popular science, before finally becoming a professional science in the 1930's.

Big ideas take time 2006

Prompted by Mike's recent comments about Michael Ruse's latest book, The Evolution-Creation Struggle, I decided to read it.

Big ideas take time 2006

The question is whether Ruse's style or the Dawkins/Dennett style of promoting evolution is the best way to go.

2006 February - Telic Thoughts 2006

I really don't think I have the time to wait while you go through Ruse's "pseudohistorical" phases: "from pseudoscience, through popular science, before finally becoming a professional science."

Big ideas take time 2006