Definitions

Sorry, no definitions found. You may find more data at d.c. cir.

Etymologies

Sorry, no etymologies found.

Support

Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word D.C. Cir.

Examples

  • The last time I handled a case like this it was unclear in the D.C. Cir. whether such cues could come in to make an otherwise unambiguous statute ambiguous, but I will defer to my Admin Law colleagues on where the law is now.

    Concurring Opinions Glenn Cohen 2010

  • Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.) ruled

    Reporters Committee News 2009

  • Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F. 2d 1, 36 (D.C. Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S.

    Latest Articles 2009

  • Ethyl Corp. v. EPA, 541 F. 2d 1, 36 (D.C. Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S.

    Michelle Malkin 2009

  • Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. to clarify the standard for when government agencies expedite processing of FOIA requests.

    Reporters Committee News 2009

  • 147 F. 3d 935, 946-48 & n. 9, 950-51 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ( "[a] ntitrust scholars have long recognized the undesirability of having courts oversee product design, and any dampening of technological innovation would be at cross-purposes with antitrust law").

    Groklaw 2008

  • 147 F. 3d 935, 946-48 & n. 9, 950-51 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ( "[a] ntitrust scholars have long recognized the undesirability of having courts oversee product design, and any dampening of technological innovation would be at cross-purposes with antitrust law").

    Groklaw 2008

  • 147 F. 3d 935, 946-48 & n. 9, 950-51 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ( "[a] ntitrust scholars have long recognized the undesirability of having courts oversee product design, and any dampening of technological innovation would be at cross-purposes with antitrust law").

    Groklaw 2008

  • Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. EPA, 195 F. 3d 4, 7-8 (D.C. Cir.

    unknown title 2009

  • Sessions said in the letter, "Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in Kiyemba v. Obama, 555F. 3d 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2009) that federal courts lack the constitutional authority to order the release of the Uighur detainees into the United States.

    Latest Articles 2009

Comments

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.