Arave

Arave, subsequent to his conviction after trial the Arizona and Idaho supreme courts disagreed as to whether the two statutes were substantially similar, and the U.S.

Supreme Court 2009

In light of the way in which the high court framed the issue when it granted certiorari, I am inclined to think the court will conclude that, since Arave had a fair trial, the fact that his attorney may have been ineffective during plea bargaining is irrelevant.

Supreme Court 2009

Arave appealed his conviction, alleging he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer failed to consider that the Adamson case could be overturned on appeal.

Supreme Court 2009

Arave are unusually complicated, the facts relevant to the issue raised in the appeal are fairly simple.

Supreme Court 2009

In a perfect world, Arave would be given the opportunity to reconsider whether to accept the original plea bargain.

Supreme Court 2009

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Arave v. Hoffman, 07-110.

Supreme Court 2009

Arave, subsequent to his conviction after trial the Arizona and Idaho supreme courts disagreed as to whether the two statutes were substantially similar, and the U.S.

Criminal Law 2007

In a perfect world, Arave would be given the opportunity to reconsider whether to accept the original plea bargain.

Criminal Law 2007

Arave are unusually complicated, the facts relevant to the issue raised in the appeal are fairly simple.

Criminal Law 2007

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Arave v. Hoffman, 07-110.

Criminal Law 2007