Co-ops

Co-ops are not the answer to cutting cost unless you can wait for 60 to 100 years to see results.

Pawlenty: With trigger, Dems 'will shoot themselves in the foot' 2009

Co-ops are owned and governed by the same people they insure.

Getting past the lingo of the health care debate 2009

Co-ops are not a way to get past the need for public option.

Getting past the lingo of the health care debate 2009

Co-ops, which are prevalent in Minnesota, “have helped a little bit at the margins,” Pawlenty told King.

Pawlenty: With trigger, Dems 'will shoot themselves in the foot' 2009

"Wary of Co-ops" ... maybe because they don't work?

Leading House Republican wary of health care co-op 2009

State of the Union: Co-ops for health care in Wisconsin

President Obama's popularity takes a hit with independents 2009

The insurance companies, big pharma, AMA, etc. are in cahoots with BHO, and they are going to be making the money for Reid, Pelosi, Axelrod et al. Co-ops are just another name for the public option, which is no option when policies must be converted to government run insurance ‘option’ after 5 years.

Lieberman looking for baby steps on health care. - Moe_Lane’s blog - RedState 2009

Co-ops were set up in the Marshalls to help the people get a supply of food at fair prices on their atolls.

Photo Essay: Peace Corps Volunteers Share 50 Years of Memories 2011

Letters: Co-ops, cuts and the coalition | Politics | The Guardian

Letters: Co-ops, cuts and the coalition 2011

I don't care for Co-ops in the place of a public option.

Leading House Republican wary of health care co-op 2009