Corfield

As Lash explains, Bingham made a sharp distinction between Article IV and the 14A, saying, after referring to several expositions of Artivle IV, such as Corfield, Is it not clear that other and different privileges and immunities than those to which a citizen of a State was entitled are secured by the provision of the fourteenth article...

The Volokh Conspiracy » Lash on the Original Understanding of the Privileges or Immunities Clause: 2009

As Lash explains, Bingham made a sharp distinction between Article IV and the 14A, saying, after referring to several expositions of Artivle IV, such as Corfield, “Is it not clear that other and different privileges and immunities than those to which a citizen of a State was entitled are secured by the provision of the fourteenth article, that no State shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, which are defined in the eight articles of amendment, and which were not limitations on the power of the States before the fourteenth amendment made them limitations?”

The Volokh Conspiracy » Lash on the Original Understanding of the Privileges or Immunities Clause: 2009

So, last Friday I set out with my photocopied sheets to a pre-booked seminar room in the newly-opened Corfield Court.

The Perils of Teaching « Tales from the Reading Room 2009

The experience gave him “an almost unbearable sense of thrill and rapture,” and contrasted with his feelings toward his first school: a local kindergarten called Elm Tree House, run by two sisters, Mrs. Corfield and Miss Tucker.

Storyteller Donald Sturrock 2010

In the Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 76, in defining the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States, this is quoted from the opinion of Mr. Justice Washington in Corfield v.

The Volokh Conspiracy » NRA brief in McDonald v. Chicago 2009

The privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states are those described by Corfield, cited in the Slaughterhouse Cases.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Cato brief in McDonald v. Chicago 2009

The privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states are those described by Corfield, cited in the Slaughterhouse Cases.

The Volokh Conspiracy » How I’d Approach the Privileges or Immunities Issue in McDonald 2009

In the Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 76, in defining the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States, this is quoted from the opinion of Mr. Justice Washington in Corfield v.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Cato brief in McDonald v. Chicago 2009

The privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states are those described by Corfield, cited in the Slaughterhouse Cases.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Petitioner’s Brief in McDonald v. City of Chicago (The Second Amendment Incorporation Case) 2009

The privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states are those described by Corfield, cited in the Slaughterhouse Cases.

The Volokh Conspiracy » NRA brief in McDonald v. Chicago 2009