Creationists

The title Creationists are not stupid is tendentious with the assumption that Darwinist evolution is true - absolutely true - and the belief in Creation is false - utterly false - that the existance of creationists demands a lengthy, extensive pyschoanalytical explanation as depicted in the linked post.

Creationists Are Not Stupid James F. McGrath 2010

New Creationists is a blog piece with a fictional manifesto reflecting some very real myths held by New Atheists.

2009 June - Telic Thoughts 2009

BTW, having read Of Pandas amd People, I can say that it obvious that the word Creationists was ripped out and replaced with Intelligent design advocates. bill

Creationist Credibility - The Panda's Thumb 2005

We've just watched the BBC documentary about "Ida", the 47-million-year-old monkey-lemur who might well have been on grooming terms with one of several missing links the Creationists are always saying we don't have.

Darwin Saves... zornhau 2009

How can a book titled The Creationists be updated with material on Intelligent Design?

Should Science Pursue Methodological Supernaturalism? - The Panda's Thumb 2006

From memory, I recall Creationists like Gish claiming that Archeopteryx was a bird, and nothing else.

Followup to "dragons and microbes" post - The Panda's Thumb 2005

They do not follow our constitution, they are Creationists, which is why they should never be allowed anywhere near the seat of our Gov't.

digg.com: Stories / Popular 2008

Ronald Numbers entitled The Creationists: From Scientific

The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com Jalees Rehman 2011

Science also employs methods that the "Creationists" cannot handle – a requirement for repeatable results, the use of independent peer review, and as was pointed out, constant updating of findings and conclusions.

Kirk Cameron attempts to debunk Darwin 2009

I just want to know if the 'Creationists' believe that their God put all the scientific evidence i.e., remains and fossils of Lucy, dinosaurs, other evolutionary species, etc. on earth just as 'props'?

Kirk Cameron attempts to debunk Darwin 2009