Deleuze

I think Gilles Deleuze is the campus craze these days, over here at least.

Home Is Where… « Tales from the Reading Room 2009

I believe Deleuze is useful in exposing how the privileged interiority of the subject is just another surface without depth.

Wandering in the Landscape with Wordsworth and Deleuze 2008

But because of Deleuze's immanent critique of Kant, one need not regard the non-representational dimension of the poem as extraneous to its philosophical import; within the space of the poem, that dimension stands in for the non-representational aspect of the mind, the faculty of sensation, which for Deleuze is a precondition for the operation of other faculties.

Rhyming Sensation in 'Mont Blanc' 2008

At the same time, though, our titular emphasis on the "new Deleuze" is also a bit deceptive, for this shift in Anglo-American critical interest from

Introduction 2008

Though Deleuze is not entirely unknown to scholars of

Introduction 2008

On the other hand, she finds in Deleuze's logic — if not his words — space for alternate directions in which to proceed.

GreenCine Daily: Shorts, 5/16. 2007

Deleuze is interested in this "discordant harmony," since, he claims, in such moments, "each [faculty] communicates to the other only the violence which confronts it with its own difference and divergence from the othe [r faculties]" (DR 146).

The Transcendental: Deleuze, P. B. Shelley, and the Freedom of Immobility 1997

This process is, I would argue, parallel to Leibniz’s monadological vision, again, especially in Deleuze’s reading.

Chaosmic Orders: Nonclassical Physics, Allegory, and the Epistemology of Blake's Minute Particulars. 2001

Delighted with enjoyment of [Poetic] Genius "and collecting" proverbs of Hell, "minute particulars of wisdom, and hence of philosophy in Deleuze and Guttari’s sense.

Chaosmic Orders: Nonclassical Physics, Allegory, and the Epistemology of Blake's Minute Particulars. 2001

Hopefully I have enough “cred” to inveigh against “difficult books” I am, after all, mired in the work of figures such as Deleuze, Lacan, Hegel, etc., who are the worst of the worst, but I have increasingly found myself suspicious of the “difficult work”.

Beyond blue-pencil Tusar N Mohapatra 2009