Dembski

I still think there is merit in Dembski's UPB argument in that it suggests there is more to life and the universe than randomness.

Behe 2009

If one variation (I'll call it Dembski's variation) of ID is correct, ID also tells us that this cause is detectable through mathematical reasoning.

Another Look 2009

Dembski is discussing Darwinian evolution and you claim he is saying ID is, in principle, opposed to evolution.

Blast From the Past 2010

I still think there is merit in Dembski's UPB argument in that it suggests there is more to life and the universe than randomness.

Behe 2009

Although Dembski is somewhat noncommittal, he seems to favor a design theory in which an intelligent agent programmed design into early life, or even into the early universe.

Blast From the Past 2010

Dembski is discussing Darwinian evolution and you claim he is saying ID is, in principle, opposed to evolution.

Blast From the Past 2010

However, I do think that Dembski is a disingenuous bitter dick (excusez ma francais) that has given up on being taken seriously by science and is milking the rubes to the maximum extent.

Bradley Monton's Paper criticizing Dover Decision 2009

And, at the end of the day, Dembski is attempting to poke holes in a model that nobody is claiming is demonstrating anything more than cumulative selection as opposed to all-in-one-go.

The Weasel Thread 2009

Dembski is using a particular incident to focus attention on a broader societal problem.

2009 September - Telic Thoughts 2009

Do you understand that Dembski is responding to theistic evolutionists, like Howard Van Til, (see footnotes on p. 288) who have framed their theology in such a way that it must reject ID?

Blast From the Past 2010