Flast

But the court in Flast v. Cohen in 1968 made an exception for spending alleged to violate the Establishment Clause.

Justices debate whether tax law that benefits private schools violates clause Robert Barnes 2010

But it carved out an exception in 1968, in a case called Flast v.

The Roberts Court takes up church-state separation Sinfonian 2007

But it carved out an exception in 1968, in a case called Flast v.

Archive 2007-02-25 Sinfonian 2007

In the early 1970s, the Nixon Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to greatly narrow or even overrule Flast v.

The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Erwin Chemerinsky 2010

Six of the justices agreed that the distinction of Flast made no sense.

The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Erwin Chemerinsky 2010

Justices Scalia and Thomas voted with the majority, but said that they would expressly overrule Flast v.

The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Erwin Chemerinsky 2010

In a 5–4 decision, with Justice Samuel Alito writing for the conservative majority, the Court said that Flast v.

The Conservative Assault on the Constitution Erwin Chemerinsky 2010

"Isn't the underlying premise of Flast v. Cohen that the Establishment Clause will be unenforceable unless we recognize taxpayer standing?"

Justices debate whether tax law that benefits private schools violates clause Robert Barnes 2010

Indeed, the conservatives' new approach "enables the government to end-run Flast's guarantee of access to the Judiciary."

Geoffrey R. Stone: Eviscerating the Establishment Clause Geoffrey R. Stone 2011

To solve this problem, the Supreme Court held in Flast v.

Geoffrey R. Stone: Eviscerating the Establishment Clause Geoffrey R. Stone 2011