Garcetti

The Court issued its opinion today in Garcetti v. Ceballos, No. 04-473, originally argued in the October sitting and then reargued after Justice Alito joined the Court.

Balkinization 2006

Garcetti is neither a terrible decision nor the worst thing about the Court's employee speech jurisprudence.

Is That Legal?: The Most Dangerous Decision 2006

Garcetti is neither a terrible decision nor the worst thing about the Court's employee speech jurisprudence.

Is That Legal?: July 2006 Archives 2006

The recent Supreme Court decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos further limited the rights of government employees working to protect the public interest.

Think Progress » ThinkFast AM: June 15, 2006 2006

That case was before the Supreme Court’s decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos, which said that job-related public-employee speech is not protected by the First Amendment (although that case did not involve an academic setting or any academic freedom considerations).

The Volokh Conspiracy » Sex Education, Dirty Words, and the Due Process Clause 2010

I think that Garcetti is a very narrow decision, which applies only to cases in which the employee’s work product is speech.

Is That Legal?: The Most Dangerous Decision 2006

I think that Garcetti is a very narrow decision, which applies only to cases in which the employee’s work product is speech.

Is That Legal?: July 2006 Archives 2006

In 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a little-noticed decision called Garcetti v.

Teachers' Opinions And The First Amendment - The Panda's Thumb 2007

In 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a little-noticed decision called Garcetti v.

The Panda's Thumb: February 2007 Archives 2007

Eric Garcetti: The LA Times this week called Garcetti a likely successor to Eli Broad as Los Angeles '

The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com 2010