Inerrancy

"Inerrancy" is not so much a true or false doctrine, as it is a useless doctrine.

Stand Firm 2010

"Inerrancy," that is, brings a lot more baggage with it than the average seminarian, at least those without a strong background in philosophy understand, probably realizes.

Stand Firm 2010

Inerrancy in interpretation has nothing to do with it.

Blind Faith? 2009

Inerrancy in interpretation has nothing to do with it.

Blind Faith? 2009

Me: Inerrancy in interpretation has nothing to do with it.

Blind Faith? 2009

Inerrancy is a doctrine for idiots who do not know, or think clearly about, the Bible they profess to worship.

`Cecil Sherman was no moderate' | RELIGION Blog | dallasnews.com 2010

Inerrancy requires something to be incapable of being untrue.

Ken Schenck on The Chicago Declaration on Biblical Inerrancy James F. McGrath 2009

Yes, let's do look at the question of Inerrancy and Textual Criticism on another blog: A contradiction involves a discrepancy between two or more passages.

Imperfect World, Imperfect Bible James F. McGrath 2009

Let me commend to your reading the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy to help you.

Quote of the Day (Eric Reitan) James F. McGrath 2009

Inerrancy as such is a harmless doctrine, but the concrete selective applications of it are very dangerous.

For John Shelby Spong the listening process is over « Anglican Samizdat 2009