Definitions
Sorry, no definitions found. You may find more data at jinxmchue.
Etymologies
Sorry, no etymologies found.
Support
Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word Jinxmchue.
Examples
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 00: 40, 13 February 2010 (EST) = = How to debate whether articles are important enough to be included?
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] Jinxmchue 2010
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 10: 34, 18 December 2009 (EST): So, things are perhaps too dull, eh?
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] EDmongPOOR 2010
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 17: 38, 10 April 2010
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] Jinxmchue 2010
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 00: 40, 13 February 2010 (EST) = = How to debate whether articles are important enough to be included?
-
Jinxmchue: Perhaps, but the average heterosexual marriage these days lasts no longer, so it's not exactly an effective argument.
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 18: 46, 10 April 2010 (EDT)::: It's in a comment.
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] Aschlafly 2010
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 23: 56, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] SWEATYfaggot 2010
-
This term is not used consistently on Wikipedia and liberals have seemed to make sure it's used in articles where it will generate the most scandal: e.g. Jinxmchue 15: 40, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
-
[[User: Jinxmchue | Jinx McHue]] 18: 46, 10 April 2010 (EDT)::: It's in a comment.
Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] Aschlafly 2010
-
Jinxmchue 18: 23, 6 August 2008 (EDT) "The history of homosexual relationships"?
Comments
Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.