Kochen

(It appears, in an infinitary form, as Mackey's axiom V; a related but stronger condition appears in the definition of a partial Boolean algebra in the work of Kochen and Specker [1965].)

Puppet X: 1 2009

Kochen, S. (1985), ˜A new Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics™, in P. Mittelstaedt and P. Lahti (eds), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern P.ysics 1985 (Singapore: World Scientific), pp. 151-169.

...anything but love... 2009

The same negative answer is provided much more simply by John Bell (1966) (but without the complete catalogue of probability functions achieved by Gleason), who also provides a positive answer to the question in the case of dimensionality 2; and independently these results were also achieved by Kochen and Specker (1967).

Bell's Theorem Shimony, Abner 2009

Related Entries quantum mechanics | quantum mechanics: Kochen-Specker theorem | quantum theory: von Neumann vs. Dirac

Puppet X: 1 2009

But that is impossible in view of the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem.

Bell's Theorem Shimony, Abner 2009

The first variant is due independently to Kochen and Specker (1967),

Bell's Theorem Shimony, Abner 2009

The hidden-variables theories of Kochen and Specker (1967) are explicitly of this type.

Bell's Theorem Shimony, Abner 2009

With Holzer as her mentor, Kochen too became a star of the Yiddish theater, first appearing in the Holzer production Be-Arvot ha-Negev (In the Negev Desert) in 1950.

Rokhl Holzer. 2009

The strategy of Kochen and of Heywood-Redhead is to use the entangled state of Eq. (50) to predict the outcome of measuring sz2 for particle 2 (for any choice of z ‰) by measuring its counterpart on particle

Bell's Theorem Shimony, Abner 2009

For other results to the same effect, see Kochen and Specker [1967], Gudder [1970], Holevo [1982], and, in a different direction, Pitowsky

Puppet X: 1 2009