Marbury

To say (as I did) that Marbury is right (in its argument for judicial review; it is wrong about much else, I think) * because it is right* and not merely because it is "Marbury" -- i.e., that it is regarded as right because it is a precedent -- is not a "because I say so" argument.

Balkinization 2007

I think Marbury is right and judicial review is a given.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Blatant Unconstitutionality Started Early 2010

Marbury is not about the power of the Court to make law, it is about a jurisdictional limit on the Court and conflict of law as between the constitution and legislation.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Second and Sixth Amendments 2010

I think it telling that in Marbury the Court tested this power on a law that it was charged with enforcing, ensuring that its decision could not be ignored.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Kennedy Court Comes of Age 2010

Quite true, actually, and has been ever since Marshall handed down the decision in Marbury v. Madison in 1803.

Think Progress » Lieberman satisfied by prospect that Obama nominee could make Supreme Court ‘slightly less liberal.’ 2010

For the curious, can you find any dicta in Marbury v. Madison?

The Volokh Conspiracy » Diane Wood on the Second Amendment 2010

I think Marbury is right and judicial review is a given.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Blatant Unconstitutionality Started Early 2010

For the curious, can you find any dicta in Marbury v. Madison?

The Volokh Conspiracy » Diane Wood on the Second Amendment 2010

Marbury is a cousin of Wolves G Sebastian Telfair. ...

USATODAY.com 2008

Thomas stressed it was his disappointment in Marbury's defense and leadership that led to the demotion, but Marbury has shown his offense is rounding into shape.

USATODAY.com 2007