Non-Overlapping

Non-Overlapping Magisteria (NOMA) which referred to his philosophy on science and religion, developed during his many dealings with Evolution has encountered no intellectual trouble; no new arguments have been offered.

Planet Atheism Jumile 2009

I focused in that post on the meaning of "religion," but did allude to the fact that defenders of Non-Overlapping Magisteria often misrepresent "science" as well.

Cosmic Variance 2009

He is also well known for his concept of [[Non-Overlapping Magisteria | non-overlapping magisteria]], which suggested that science and religion occupy two entirely separate

Conservapedia - Recent changes [en] 2009

Thus, quite correctly in my view, he does not accept the principle of Non-Overlapping Magisteria.

Sentient Developments 2009

There are vestiges of Gould’s NOMA Non-Overlapping Magisteria principle here, again something to be expected from Catholics and certainly something akin to what was presented during my early Catholic educational career.

And A Good Example Of Catholic Science Christopher O'Brien 2007

There are vestiges of Gould’s NOMA Non-Overlapping Magisteria principle here, again something to be expected from Catholics and certainly something akin to what was presented during my early Catholic educational career.

Archive 2007-08-01 Christopher O'Brien 2007

But I don’t quite agree with him [that science-and-religion are “Non-Overlapping Magisteria”].

Chomsky, Krauss, and me Sean 2006

Gould’s Non-Overlapping Magisteria NOMA seems definitely out of place here.

DO GEESE SEE GOD? (And should we even try to know?) - The Panda's Thumb 2006