Noncongruent

Noncongruent affecting variables, such as “not-yet-happenings,” are imputedly knowable in this coarse sense.

What Does a Buddha Know in Knowing the Past, Present, and Future? ��� Part Three: Analysis of the Gelug Prasangika Assertions 2009

Noncongruent affecting variables are nonstatic (impermanent) phenomena that are neither forms of physical phenomena (gzugs) nor ways of being aware of something (shes-pa).

Congruent and Noncongruent Affecting Variables 2006

Noncongruent affecting variables, such as acquisition of the new house, depend on a basis for imputation – the new house that is acquired.

The Two Truths in Vaibhashika and Sautrantika 2006

Noncongruent affecting variables do not share five things in common (mtshungs-ldan lnga) with the primary consciousness (rnam-shes) and subsidiary awarenesses (sems-byung, mental factors) that they accompany.

The Two Truths in Vaibhashika and Sautrantika 2006

Noncongruent affecting variables and static phenomena are imputedly knowable phenomena.

The Two Truths in Vaibhashika and Sautrantika 2006

Further Points to Differentiate Noncongruent Affecting Variables and Labeling

What Does a Buddha Know in Knowing the Past, Present, and Future? ��� Part Three: Analysis of the Gelug Prasangika Assertions 2009

[See: Congruent and Noncongruent Affecting Variables.]

What Does a Buddha Know in Knowing the Past, Present, and Future? ��� Part Two: Variant Indian Buddhist Views Concerning Temporally Related Phenomena 2009

[See: Congruent and Noncongruent Affecting Variables.]

The Mechanism of Karma: The Mahayana Presentation, Except for Gelug Prasangika ��� Session Two: Mental Factors Associated with Karma 2008

[See: Congruent and Noncongruent Affecting Variables.]

The Nature of Time as a Temporal Interval 2007

[See: Congruent and Noncongruent Affecting Variables.]

The Distinction between Tendencies and Habits Included in the Two Sets of Obscuration, According to Gelug 2006