Reliabilism

Reliabilism as thus far presented implies that the de facto reliability of the process makes her belief justified, but is that correct?

Reliabilism Goldman, Alvin 2008

˜Reliabilism™ is sometimes used broadly to refer to any theory of knowledge or justification that emphasizes truth-getting or truth-indicating properties.

Reliabilism Goldman, Alvin 2008

Reliabilism is one of these views but by no means the only one.

Reliabilism Goldman, Alvin 2008

˜Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge™, in Epistemic Value, eds.

The Value of Knowledge Pritchard, Duncan 2007

Reliabilism, then, comes in two forms: as a theory of justification or as a theory of knowledge.

Epistemology Steup, Matthias 2005

Reliabilism is the view that one knows p if and only if one arrives at (or sustains) the belief p via a reliable method.

The Epistemic Closure Principle Luper, Steven 2005

Reliabilism, on the other hand, allows that, even though Tim and Tim* are mentally alike, they differ justificationally, since Tim's beliefs are (by and large) produced by reliable cognitive faculties, whereas the faculties that produce Tim*'s beliefs may count as unreliable.

Epistemology Steup, Matthias 2005

Reliabilism, on the other hand, suggests that Tim*'s answer is incorrect.

Epistemology Steup, Matthias 2005

Reliabilism says that the justification of one's beliefs is a function of, not one's evidence, but the reliability of one's belief sources such as memorial, perceptual and introspective states and processes.

Epistemology Steup, Matthias 2005

Reliabilism holds that the crucial facts in the supervenience base of epistemic facts are facts about the reliability of the causal process producing or sustaining the belief.

Naturalized Epistemology Feldman, Richard 2001