Rosillo

An exception is Brazil’s PRO-ALCOOL programme, due to the high productivity of sugar cane (Rosillo-Calle and Cortez, 1998).

Chapter 9 2000

Within this reality, any negative effects that bioethanol production might have had should be considered as part of the overall problem, not the problem (Rosillo-Calle and Hall, 1986; Goldemberg et al, 1992).

Chapter 10 1993

The argument should be analysed against the background of the world's (or an individual country's or region's) real food situation of food supply and demand (ever-increasing food surpluses in most industrialized and a number of developing countries), the use of food as animal feed, the under-utilized agricultural production potential, the increased potential for agricultural productivity, and the advantages and disadvantages of producing biofuels (Rosillo-Calle and Hall, 1987).

Chapter 10 1993

These vary from $26 to $60 per barrel of oil-equivalent from sugarcane in Brazil, and $60 from maize in the United States, to $65 from grain in the EC (Rosillo-Calle et al, 1991).

Chapter 10 1993

Unlike the KCJ woodstove programme, government involvement in the joint project had a negative impact and distorted the economics, which was further complicated by the absence of a clear and cohesive long term government policy on ethanol production (Rosillo-Calle et al 1991).

Chapter 7 1993

In the 1983/84 harvest, 47 per cent of the total amount of sugarcane crushed was used for ethanol production, and in 1987/88 the proportion reached 61 per cent (Rosillo-Calle et al, 1991).

Chapter 7 1993

"Both Rosillo and Quintero will have a court appearance early next week.

Salem-News.com 2010

"Both Rosillo and Quintero will have a court appearance early next week.

Salem-News.com 2010