Senates

That idea is based on the idea that a current Senate may not bind future Senates.

Matthew Yglesias » Longstanding Problems Are Still Problematic 2010

Annie Lowery delves into possible Senates aimed at slicing the population up in different ways:

Matthew Yglesias » Senate “What Ifs” 2010

Senate rules say it takes 67 votes, but the Supreme Court has ruled that prior Senates cannot bind the hands of future Senates.

Matthew Yglesias » Pure Stalling 2010

While it is true that a current Senate may not bind future Senates, it would also be unconstitutional for a majority of a current Senate to try to bind itself to an unconstitutional rule.

Matthew Yglesias » Longstanding Problems Are Still Problematic 2010

This is a very bad for the Repubicans because they need all the Senates they can get.

First on the CNN Ticker: Florida senator to resign seat 2009

Senate rules say it takes 67 votes, but the Supreme Court has ruled that prior Senates cannot bind the hands of future Senates.

Matthew Yglesias » Pure Stalling 2010

Maybe when that happens, we can start to see some fiscal responsibility and maturity return to the Senates and we can derail this tax and spend pork barrel express, called the Obama choo choo

Senate Democrat fuming at Lieberman 2009

Set to the seat by a crook named Blago and told it would cost 10G's But i guess the article is correct, they are holding him up to the Senates unbelievabley high standards of conduct.

Senate Ethics Committee admonishes Burris 2009

A pox on both their Houses, and their Senates. posted by Mungowitz @ 1/24/2009 01: 06: 00 PM

Please, Sir, Can I have some MORE? 2009

And the leaders would sit in Assemblies and Houses and Senates and they would discuss, conciliate, find the center and thus exert sensible leadership.

Peter Samuelson: Democracy With No Center Is a Zero Peter Samuelson 2011