Shapin

a favorable assessment of what Orr describes as Shapin's natural history of the American scientist.

The Chicago Blog 2009

a favorable assessment of what Orr describes as Shapin's natural history of the American scientist.

The Chicago Blog 2009

a favorable assessment of what Orr describes as Shapin's natural history of the American scientist.

The Chicago Blog 2009

Note 13: See, for example, Shapin and Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump (1985);

Trafficking Materials and Gendered Experimental Practices: Radium Research in Early 20th Century Vienna 2007

These included debates with John Wallis and Seth Ward that centred on Hobbes's alleged squaring of the circle (Jesseph 1999), debates with John Bramhall about liberty and necessity (continuing some discussions of the 1640s), and debates with Robert Boyle about the experimental physics of the Royal Society (Shapin & Schaffer 1989).

Thomas Hobbes Duncan, Stewart 2009

It is worth stressing that Boyle had this limited view of his result, for Shapin and Schaffer 1985 suggest that

Sticky Wants to Grab 2009

In his new book, Shapin ventures beyond the strict boundaries of the history of science.

Which Scientist Can You Trust? Orr, H. Allen 2009

The Franklin L. Ford Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University, Shapin is perhaps best known for two works on seventeenth-century science, A Social History of Truth (1994) and The Scientific Revolution (1996).

Which Scientist Can You Trust? Orr, H. Allen 2009

My redis­cov­ery of the word “immured,” which is how Shapin describes a ship­ment of organic aspara­gus that had been held up in dis­tri­b­u­tion from Argentina.

Big Organic « Snarkmarket 2006

“The danger comes when science gets to be seen as simply politics by other means,” Shapin says.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Science vs. Politics? 2007