from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition
- adj. Of or relating to the behavioristic theories and methods of B.F. Skinner.
- n. A follower of B.F. Skinner's theories or methods.
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
- n. A person who endorses the behavioristic tradition of B. F. Skinner, that is, psychology should study the conditions under which behavior occurs, and that behavior is observable and measurable, as are the environmental conditions that control it.
- adj. Of or pertaining to the methods and theories of B. F. Skinner
from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.
- n. a follower of the theories or methods of B. F. Skinner
- adj. of or relating to B. F. Skinner or his behaviorist psychology
Sorry, no etymologies found.
Vallee has also made note of the fact that the "random" _frequency_ (and location) patterns of ufo/uap phenomena over time being witnessed or detected by technological means (if not both in very many cases), might suggest a kind of Skinnerian random reinforcement schedule of stimuli, which, in B.F.
The unnecessary losses continue in our Skinnerian world.
In our rush to turn workplances into Skinnerian rat cages, our leaders forget his teachings.
Distinguished experimental psychologists who followed the Skinnerian behavioral framework—after Professor B. F. Skinner from Harvard—claimed that our thoughts and feelings were either illusions or immaterial to how humans functioned.
But he also had training in the rigors of data-driven experimental science, including a two-year fellowship at a Skinnerian laboratory, where he studied neurotransmitter levels in pigeons and monkeys.
A Skinnerian motivation system creates many losses.
Or maybe we just rue the resemblance to Skinnerian lab rats taught to paw the levers in their cages by the prospect of earning their little rewards of food and drink.
First, can you name anyone who is a Skinnerian behaviorist?
But now it is thirty years hence, and for Schwartz to position his findings against Skinnerian behaviorism at this point really is a strawman argument.
Moreover, even a Skinnerian behaviorist would never say that no brain changes would result either from external stimuli of training or further processing of information inside the brain.