Strunk

I was aware myself of some inconsistencies in Strunk & White, and I was aware that it has detractors, but I had not seen this particular document before.

The Volokh Conspiracy » From Language Log to the New York Times Magazine 2010

I find that once I've listed something in Strunk and Light, I'm much, much less likely to use it unthinkingly in the generative flow of new writing.

SeeLight: 2006

Putting the White back in Strunk and White – A good reminder of some essential writing (and design) guidelines.

Putting the White back in Strunk and White 2006

Some of the incorrectitudes I correctituded in Strunk & Light are actually "eggcorns": homonyms or close-to-homonyms of the real expression which are substituted for the real expression because they kinda make sense.

SeeLight: 2006

Putting the White back in Strunk and White – A good reminder of some essential writing (and design) guidelines.

Windows Vista Speech Recognition Demo Gone Awry – Google Video 2006

Some of the incorrectitudes I correctituded in Strunk & Light are actually "eggcorns": homonyms or close-to-homonyms of the real expression which are substituted for the real expression because they kinda make sense.

Eggcorns 2006

I find that once I've listed something in Strunk and Light, I'm much, much less likely to use it unthinkingly in the generative flow of new writing.

Strunk and Light I: Think About It 2006

I would have put this in Strunk & Light, but this is a peeve of another color.

SeeLight: 2006

I would have put this in Strunk & Light, but this is a peeve of another color.

Almond Eyes 2006

figby. com » Putting the White back in Strunk and White figby. com

Putting the White back in Strunk and White 2006