Supp

Hook and the suppositional theorist (call her Supp) come spectacularly apart when p (~A) is high and

Conditionals Edgington, Dorothy 2006

"'Knaw him then?' says I."'Supp'd with him night afore last,' says he, matter-of-fact like; and I knaw'd he warn't lying -- 'Me and the Emperor and another gentleman.'

The Gentleman A Romance of the Sea Alfred Ollivant 1900

Playmedia v. AOL, 171 F. Supp.2d 1094 (CD Cal 2001).

Archive 2009-07-01 Rebecca Tushnet 2009

See Farag, 587 F.Supp. 2d at 463 (distinguishing identification use of race from invidious propensity inference based on race).

The Volokh Conspiracy » Affirmative Action and Racial Profiling Revisited 2010

Gristede's Foods, Inc.v. Unkechauge Nation, -- F. Supp.2d --, 2009 WL 3235181 (E.D.N.Y.)

Archive 2009-10-01 Rebecca Tushnet 2009

Interesting take on a generally similar claim where a federal jusdge rejected the claim – Dyer v. Northwest, 334 F. Supp.2d 1196 (D.N.D. 2004).

The Volokh Conspiracy » Judge Suing Newspaper for Breach of Web Privacy Agreement Over Being Outed as Author of Anonymous Comments 2010

President Clinton was still obligated to answer questions during during depositions truthfully and not answer questions intentionally falsely, which Federal Judge Wright deemed occurred, when she fined Clinton $90,000 in 1999 — see Jones v. Clinton, 36 F. Supp.2d.

The Volokh Conspiracy » It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Cover-Up — Sestak Edition 2010

Farag v. United States, 587 F.Supp. 2d 436 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

The Volokh Conspiracy » Affirmative Action and Racial Profiling Revisited 2010

President Clinton was still obligated to answer questions during during depositions truthfully and not answer questions intentionally falsely, which Federal Judge Wright deemed occurred, when she fined Clinton $90,000 in 1999 — see Jones v. Clinton, 36 F. Supp.2d.

The Volokh Conspiracy » It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Cover-Up — Sestak Edition 2010

Rptr. 474 (1990); Kevorkian v. Arnett, 939 F. Supp.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Kagan and the Cult of Personality 2010