Troxel

Another Tea Party member who approves of what Troxel is doing is Kurt Feigel, who “who frequently works and communicates with Troxel and runs a companion blog.”

Think Progress » Virginia Tea Partiers Endorse Posting Perriello’s Home Address, Insist They’re Not ‘A Violent Group Of People’ 2010

There ` s a Supreme Court case called Troxel versus Granville, and in that case, any parent is presumed to be the best guardian for children.

CNN Transcript Jul 7, 2009 2009

It is very difficult because there is a Supreme Court case called Troxel versus Granville that essentially says unless you prove that a natural parent is unfit, they do have the right to determine who can and cannot see their children.

CNN Transcript Dec 25, 2007 2007

BIERBAUER: Well, on the merits of this case, there was very little that really seemed to compel the court to take it, but if there was any hint of how the justices might have felt that was given here, it was given just a few weeks ago, when the court ruled in the case known as Troxel versus Granville on the question of grandparents 'right, that parents' rights superseded the rights of someone else.

CNN Transcript - Breaking News: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Gonzalez Family Appeal - June 28, 2000 2000

Mark Lloyd, the Lynchburg Tea Party's chairman, posted a disclaimer on the group's Web page that called Troxel "a participant in the Lynchburg Tea Party."

News for Lynchburg News Advance Lynchburg News Advance 2010

Mike Troxel and Nigel Coleman set the rules of the debate when they published an address knowing that it would encourage violent behaviour.

What's wrong with Tit for Tat? 2010

I want bullies like Mike Troxel and Nigel Coleman to understand that they did something dangerous.

What's wrong with Tit for Tat? 2010

On Monday, Lynchburg Tea Party member Mike Troxel posted what he believed to be the home address of Rep. Tom Periello (D-VA), encouraging people to drop by for a “good face-to-face chat”

What's wrong with Tit for Tat? 2010

Update 20100324 2054 PDT -- It occurs to me that Mike Troxel and Nigel Coleman don't think they did anything dangerous -- to them.

What's wrong with Tit for Tat? 2010

Mike Troxel and Nigel Coleman did, and Nigel (who's clearly not paid to think) considers attempted arson at Bo Periello's house as "collateral damage".

What's wrong with Tit for Tat? 2010