Woodlock

After seeing the designated area, Judge Douglas Woodlock stated, "One cannot conceive of other elements put in place to make a space more of an affront to the idea of free expression than the designated demonstration zone."

John W. Whitehead: Harold Hodge v. SCOTUS: Has the First Amendment Become an Exercise in Futility? John W. Whitehead 2012

After seeing the designated area, Judge Douglas Woodlock stated, "One cannot conceive of other elements put in place to make a space more of an affront to the idea of free expression than the designated demonstration zone."

John W. Whitehead: Harold Hodge v. SCOTUS: Has the First Amendment Become an Exercise in Futility? John W. Whitehead 2012

After seeing the designated area, Judge Douglas Woodlock stated, "One cannot conceive of other elements put in place to make a space more of an affront to the idea of free expression than the designated demonstration zone."

John W. Whitehead: Harold Hodge v. SCOTUS: Has the First Amendment Become an Exercise in Futility? John W. Whitehead 2012

After seeing the designated area, Judge Douglas Woodlock stated, "One cannot conceive of other elements put in place to make a space more of an affront to the idea of free expression than the designated demonstration zone."

John W. Whitehead: Harold Hodge v. SCOTUS: Has the First Amendment Become an Exercise in Futility? John W. Whitehead 2012

ConnectU said they had not seen that evidence, but that a forensic expert had informed Judge Douglas P. Woodlock of its existence.

The Newest Twist in ConnectU v. Facebook - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com 2008

ConnectU said they had not seen that evidence, but that a forensic expert had informed Judge Douglas P. Woodlock of its existence.

The Newest Twist in ConnectU v. Facebook - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com 2008

Ruehlman harked back to an earlier opinion by Federal Judge Douglas Woodlock, who had reprimanded a plaintiff for trying to regulate gunmakers through the courts: “It is the province of legislative or authorized administrated bodies and not the judicial branch, to advance through democratic channels policies that would directly or indirectly either (1) ban some classes of handguns or (2) transform firearm enterprises into insurers against misuse of their products.”

Outgunned PETER HARRY BROWN DANIEL G. ABEL 2003

Judge Woodlock also ruled “that frustration at the failure of legislatures to enact laws sufficient to curb handgun injuries is not adequate reason to engage the judicial forum in efforts to implement a broad change.”

Outgunned PETER HARRY BROWN DANIEL G. ABEL 2003

Ruehlman harked back to an earlier opinion by Federal Judge Douglas Woodlock, who had reprimanded a plaintiff for trying to regulate gunmakers through the courts: “It is the province of legislative or authorized administrated bodies and not the judicial branch, to advance through democratic channels policies that would directly or indirectly either (1) ban some classes of handguns or (2) transform firearm enterprises into insurers against misuse of their products.”

Outgunned PETER HARRY BROWN DANIEL G. ABEL 2003

Judge Woodlock also ruled “that frustration at the failure of legislatures to enact laws sufficient to curb handgun injuries is not adequate reason to engage the judicial forum in efforts to implement a broad change.”

Outgunned PETER HARRY BROWN DANIEL G. ABEL 2003