ateleological

That anyone considers biological evolution "ateleological" is inflammatory, satirical, and just plain silly.

Deep Homology and Longevity 2008

In principle it's possible for science to support (hint at, point toward) a conclusion of teleology, but to say it supports an ateleological conclusion is to go beyond the empirical evidence.

Darwin Strips Reality of Purpose? 2008

Its antithesis lies in the belief that it is more rational to believe that the physical world supports an ateleological perspective.

Beckwith on ID 2008

Its antithesis lies in the belief that it is more rational to believe that the physical world supports an ateleological perspective.

Beckwith on ID 2008

Would you argue that the computer booting process is evidence for an ateleological electronic effect proving that operating software was the consequence of a non-telic and unknown electronic process?

Beckwith on ID 2008

If the gaps are this cavernous inserting philosophical naturalism into the gaps and asserting an ateleological process is arrogant.

Dark Matter Can Enlighten Minds 2008

Would you argue that the computer booting process is evidence for an ateleological electronic effect proving that operating software was the consequence of a non-telic unknown electronic process?

Beckwith on ID 2008

That in itself could be explored of course but the question for you is if it were true that data did not support a gradual natural process, what ateleological, non-incremental process to life are you able to cite even in theory?

Critical Thinking 2007

September 18th, 2007 at 5: 08 pm the question for you is if it were true that data did not support a gradual natural process, what ateleological, non-incremental process to life are you able to cite even in theory?

Critical Thinking 2007

Koonin's approach signifies the treadmill that we have been on in attempting to fit origin theories within an ateleological framework.

Another Perspective on Origins 2007