closed-class

Across dozens of studies, junk words [closed-class words like prepositions and pronouns] have proven to be powerful markers of peoples [sic] psychological states.

Archive 2010-05-01 GamesWithWords 2010

Across dozens of studies, junk words [closed-class words like prepositions and pronouns] have proven to be powerful markers of peoples [sic] psychological states.

You are what you say GamesWithWords 2010

But functional words, as closed-class items, will not make up a large part of the vocabulary.

How many words? | Linguism | Language Blog 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009

Recall would be a lot higher if pairs involving closed-class words and the standard phonetic confusables above were taken into account (our own metrics based on a large corpus of real mistakes shows that our recall is in fact higher than the 20-25\% found by Hirst, and is around 40\%).

MSDN Blogs 2009