consequentialists

For a start, the distinction helps frame a challenge to the traditional assumption that what separates so-called consequentialists and deontologists is that the former but not the latter are committed to the idea that all reasons for action are teleological.

Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral vs. Agent-Relative Ridge, Michael 2005

Democracy, thinks Fish, siding with the "consequentialists" who believe that some forms of speech must be regulated in order to preserve First Amendment goals - nothing less than protecting democracy.

Latest Articles SIERRA VISTA Herald/Review 2010

The question of why you have chosen to protect certain rights but not others is open to question and criticism, just as it is for consequentialists.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The “Racist” Charge 2010

Many libertarians are, as David Nieporent notes, non-consequentialists and support free markets as a good in itself.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Books that Influenced Me the Most 2010

The question of why you have chosen to protect certain rights but not others is open to question and criticism, just as it is for consequentialists.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The “Racist” Charge 2010

This assumption may be congenial to consequentialists, who evaluate laws in terms of the resulting social costs and benefits.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The “Racist” Charge 2010

There are flavors of Lockeanism and Kantianism that are consequentialists, but not all.

IPSC: daily double--theory Rebecca Tushnet 2009

Many libertarians are, as David Nieporent notes, non-consequentialists and support free markets as a good in itself.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Books that Influenced Me the Most 2010

There are flavors of Lockeanism and Kantianism that are consequentialists, but not all.

Archive 2009-08-01 Rebecca Tushnet 2009

Anderson: Many libertarians are, as David Nieporent notes, non-consequentialists and support free markets as a good in itself.

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Books that Influenced Me the Most 2010