fodor's

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009

"You are very naive - it has everything to do with creationism - of course, to deny adaptationism is not to endorse creationism - but to write a piece slagging off natural selection in that way, is to give a piece of candy to the creationists - I am sure that duane gish has already incorporated this into his talks of course natural selection has to work on an array of given things, but this is not to deny selection - especially not through fodor's silly arguments about analogies - and certainly not adaptationism the point of course is that fodor did not simply write a technical piece on adaptation - he wrote a piece flamboyantly denying selection in today's climate, where we have just had two ultra right supreme court justices appointed, I think his behavior is somewhere between stupid and wicked"

ScreenTalk 2009