i.i.d.

Likewise CUSUM, which assumes i.i.d. variables, normality, and stability.

John Terry’s sacking as England captain tells us something interesting... 2008

Since the “true” errors were much higher than such estimates would have been, this would show that the actual error distribution in 1999 was tremendously far from i.i.d.

Hansen and the "Destruction of Creation" « Climate Audit 2007

I thnk that econometricians and even business statisticians are, in some ways, more useful because they are used to autocorrelated series and have different instincts than an i.i.d. statistician.

Bürger and "Skill" « Climate Audit 2007

The t-value for the trend coefficient is only 1.24, which is not 95% significant even for i.i.d. and there is lots of autocorrelation here.

Revkin on the Hansen Fiasco « Climate Audit 2007

I guess Rasmus assumed that the distributions would be i.i.d.

Unthreaded #6 « Climate Audit 2007

Initially he tests against white noise i.e. normally distributed, i.i.d.

Climate Insensitivity and AR(1) Models « Climate Audit 2007

A z-test, or t-test, or some other statistical test may indicate that near-ground based temperature measurements are NOT independently and identically distributed i.i.d.

Hansen and the Great White North « Climate Audit 2007

Any i.i.d. assumption for errors in the 1999 estimates would give a pretty tight error interval.

Hansen and the "Destruction of Creation" « Climate Audit 2007

This is a supposition and not proven, although my gut tells me the data is not i.i.d. as you suggested.

Hansen and the Great White North « Climate Audit 2007

The lognormal sample change in my code AR1=0 is i.i.d., and equivalent of a white noise process in a multiplicative system!

Q.e.d. « Climate Audit 2006