paulsen's

JC knows, I know, and you know full well what that was about. and given mr paulsen's penchant for dramatic excess, I feel confident he did as well. having no strong bias vis-a-vis the abortion debate, I welcome thoughtful views on either side (my last read on the issue was an article by Robert P. George) but can do without the name calling and innuendo engaged in by the sophisticated mr Paulsen.

Balkinization 2007

Damn, I just heard something but didn't get the whole thing, something about AIG getting more $$$$ and paulsen's brother owning one of the hedgefund companies getting the money .........

Latest Articles 2009

JC made a simple point, viz, Mr Paulsen's statements are occasionally anything but * sophisticated*. his entry in "What Roe ..." questioned not only the quality of the opposing views but also the character of the opponents - unless "person of violence" is a complimentary phrase the sophistication of which escapes an uncredentialed (in law) rustic like me. (and possibly challenged the integrity of this blog's host as well; I forget which of the minority opinion contributors did that). your suggestion that challenging the conservative mr paulsen's agressive style indicates some dogmatic form of liberalism "scares" me just as much as JC's rather innocuous comment apparently did you. underneath the patina of concern for extremism is run-of-the-mill liberal bashing. worse, your justification of mr paulsen's "spite a boyfriend" comment is patently disingenuous.

Balkinization 2007