preznit

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

| Reply | Permalink the writing was on the wall. when you've got an extremely unpopular second term preznit breaking records for low approval ratings, you're gonna get the long shots, the last chancers, and the self-financed vanity candidates. especially since current conventional wisdom is that if you win the nomination but lose in the general election you don't get a second bite at the apple.

McCain Campaign's Ad Spending Now Nearly 100 Percent Devoted To Attack Ads 2009

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007

"Bart" 's single 'argument' seems to be that unless the preznit is given unfettered discretion, "bad things" can happen, and thus a court shouldn't allow such; this 'argument' is the only way to proceed from the mealymouthed "the preznit is CinC" to "the preznit has plenary and absolute authority on all things military".

Balkinization 2007