sarcastro

So– what sarcastro is referring to is that “no everyone” e.g.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Jeff Rosen Quits “Blogging”: 2009

If only one commenter was to be allowed to express themselves 100% of the time in VC comment threads through pure sarcasm i.e., big implied “NOT” in front of all their comments, then I would vote for Falsifiabilitor over sarcastro.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Posner on Consumer Financial Protection Paternalism: 2009

As sarcastro said above, it us adenine to act as if there is only pure communism and pure socialism.

The Volokh Conspiracy » How Private Property Saved the Pilgrims 2009

Also, kudos to sarcastro for contributing nothing whatsoever although he/she may have impressed themselves with a remarkable wit and power over the language.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Fined for Inadequate Insurance 2009

Wow that blog is lame, sarcastro... where the heck did you find that?

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Obama/Joker Poster Is Racist, Says a Washington Post Article by the Newspaper’s Culture Critic: 2009

The crowd gave the sarcastro-clap, and I was watching Lindy Ruff behind the bench.

BfloBlog.com 2009

That puts him in a different category from sarcastro, and like I said, Brian’s category is called “trolling.”

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Timing of Justice Stevens’ Retirement 2010

That puts him in a different category from sarcastro, and like I said, Brian’s category is called “trolling.”leo marvinQuote

The Volokh Conspiracy » The Timing of Justice Stevens’ Retirement 2010