Definitions
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
- noun Plural form of
securitizer .
Etymologies
Sorry, no etymologies found.
Support
Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word securitizers.
Examples
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Three, Mr. Kahl's arguments mean that the typical nonprime lenders was violating the rules requiring that they make criminal referrals and engaged in widespread fraud in selling the fraudulent loans to private label securitizers and Fannie and Freddie.
William K. Black: Lenders Put the Lies in Liar's Loans William K. Black 2010
-
Fannie and Freddie did not start securitizing and selling large quantities of subprime and other exotic loans until 2007 or so, by which time private-label securitizers had already sowed the seeds of disaster.
-
One explanation -- advanced by Lockhart -- is that Fannie and Freddie were competing for market share with the private label securitizers and had to purchase substantial amounts of subprime mortgages in order to retain their position in a growing market.
-
Krugman produces data to show that a) Fannie and Freddie did not start securitizing large quantities of subprime and other exotic loans until 2007 or so, by which time private-label securitizers had already sowed the seeds of disaster and b) that Fannie and Freddie’s subprime business post-dated the years of fastest housing-price appreciation.
-
The Senate bill would force "securitizers" to retain 5 percent of whatever they issue for sale into the secondary market.
Comments
Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.