Definitions

Sorry, no definitions found. You may find more data at codepage.

Etymologies

Sorry, no etymologies found.

Support

Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word Codepage.

Examples

  • Each Codepage held a different set of non-ASCII characters.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Since Microsoft Windows has no use for the control characters 128 through 159, Windows fonts commonly use Codepage 1252, which has ASCII in the first 128 characters, ISO-8859-1 in characters 160 through 255, and other symbols in the characters 128 through 159.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Hence, we call a text that uses non-ASCII characters in a character set like Codepage 850 or

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • For those interested, the "funny character" is character 151 (97H), and is specific to Codepage 1252 [V. 76].

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Codepage 850 [MS-DOS] was very common; now it's rare except in some texts that have survived those ten years.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Some of our files produced just a few years ago using non-ASCII character sets like Codepage 850 are already giving problems for some readers.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • And everybody accepts ASCII -- a pure ASCII file is valid ISO-8859-anything, valid Codepage-anything, and valid Unicode UTF-8.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Codepage 1252 and Unicode agree on the numerical values of the accented characters and symbols to be represented by the values 160 through 255.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • Codepage 437, and later Codepage 850, were commonly used for English and some major Western European languages on MS-DOS.

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

  • I changed just one thing: Abbyy recognized the em-dashes as such, and output them as a special character in Codepage 1252 for em-dashes, which isn't available in ASCII, so I converted that to the PG standard

    The Project Gutenberg FAQ 2002 Jim Tinsley

Comments

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.