Kelber

Indeed, Kelber himself says slightly later that an exploration of the modes and processes of composition is "one of the most urgent tasks toward getting a better grip on early Christian tradition" p.39.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

Nevertheless, Kelber is aware that, if "media blindness" is a danger he has sought to combat, "media determinism" is a danger lying at the opposite extreme p.260.

Review of Jesus, the Voice, and the Text James F. McGrath 2009

Indeed, Kelber himself says slightly later that an exploration of the modes and processes of composition is "one of the most urgent tasks toward getting a better grip on early Christian tradition" p.39.

Review of Jesus, the Voice, and the Text James F. McGrath 2009

For instance, in providing eleven bullet points of problems with form criticism pp.244-246, Kelber writes, Oral discourse is uniquely dependent upon concrete social contextuality.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

Here we find Kelber looking backwards, around, and forward, and we get his most important insights expressed in a way that takes many of the criticisms of colleagues and insights of other researchers into consideration.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

Chapter two offers an interview of Kelber by Thatcher, and it includes one of the most crucial questions in this field, one asked all too infrequently: when we envisage a Gospel author writing his Gospel, what do we imagine the details of the process and procedure to have been p.37.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

Nevertheless, Kelber is aware that, if "media blindness" is a danger he has sought to combat, "media determinism" is a danger lying at the opposite extreme p.260.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

This makes it impossible to speak of "originals" and "variants" - indeed, according to Kelber, each rendition was not only "an original version" but "the original version" p.5, quoting Kelber; see too p.23.

Review of Jesus, the Voice, and the Text James F. McGrath 2009

This makes it impossible to speak of "originals" and "variants" - indeed, according to Kelber, each rendition was not only "an original version" but "the original version" p.5, quoting Kelber; see too p.23.

Archive 2009-03-01 James F. McGrath 2009

Here we find Kelber looking backwards, around, and forward, and we get his most important insights expressed in a way that takes many of the criticisms of colleagues and insights of other researchers into consideration.

Review of Jesus, the Voice, and the Text James F. McGrath 2009