badscience

"group" called badscience which has about 700 members, but I think the facebook people are transferring all of it over to the new "page", which is nice.

Bad Science 2008

The most interesting questions aren't around individual nuggets of data, but rather how we can corral it to create an information architecture that serves up the whole picture.guardian.co.uk/badscience

How can we corral data to reveal the big picture? | Ben Goldacre 2011

It would be hard to find a better example of this sort of fuzzy thinking (that has been gleefully dissected by the blogosphere: see my colleague Trevor Butterworth at stats, pharyngula, and badscience, just for starters), than this recent paper.

Maia Szalavitz: Evidence is Not Fascism: Left and Right V. Science 2008

Doesn't Ralph's second EVER adventure (as recently seen in Showcase Presents) deal with Aztec monsters (or badscience recreations thereof)?

Week 21: Thunderbird Rides the Lightning Douglas Wolk 2006

A physician and science writer based in Britain, Dr. Goldacre debunks pseudoscience and promotes evidence-based medicine in his column in the Guardian newspaper, as well as on his blog, badscience.net, and on Twitter/bengoldacre.

NYT > Home Page By NATASHA SINGER 2010

Updates article at badscience.net rated PG for language: It's been a marvellous year for bull.

StarTribune.com rss feed 2010

Updates article at badscience.net rated PG for language: It's been a marvellous year for bull.

StarTribune.com rss feed 2010

Oh dear, yes, badscience. net seems to have gone down again.

MetaFilter 2009

Looks like the badscience. net web server needed some load immunization.

MetaFilter 2009

He would find the answer on badscience. net, where the great Ben Goldacre clinically debunks the more outlandish scientific theories du jour.

The Independent - Frontpage RSS Feed 2009