Definitions

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

  • prefix Prefix meaning "against", "contrary to", "in opposition to", "counter-".
  • prefix Prefix denoting reciprocal action; "in return"; "counter-".
  • prefix Prefix denoting restoration or a return to a previous state; "back again".
  • prefix Prefix denoting repetition; "over again"; "anew"; again-.

Etymologies

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License

From Middle English gain- (prefix), from Old English geġn-, gēan- ("back, against, in return", prefix), from Proto-Germanic *gagin (“towards, against”). Cognate with Dutch tegen- ("counter-"), German gegen- ("against, toward, at"), Icelandic gagn- ("through"). More at again.

Support

Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word gain-.

Examples

  • Both sides have been talking about reducing the corporate gain-

    FAIR Thee Well? 2011

  • Both sides have been talking about reducing the corporate gain-

    FAIR Thee Well? 2011

  • Corporations were faced with clear alternatives: Either they could revamp their managerial structures entirely, abandoning the structure of top-down control established after World War II, in order to forge the kind of cooperation and gain- and pain-sharing that might have smoothed the transition to an era of lower and falling profits; or they could deepen their reliance on top-down control and make up for the loss of worker incentives that falling wages imposed with an intensification of supervisory control.

    FAT and MEAN DAVID M. GORDON 2003

  • Corporations were faced with clear alternatives: Either they could revamp their managerial structures entirely, abandoning the structure of top-down control established after World War II, in order to forge the kind of cooperation and gain- and pain-sharing that might have smoothed the transition to an era of lower and falling profits; or they could deepen their reliance on top-down control and make up for the loss of worker incentives that falling wages imposed with an intensification of supervisory control.

    FAT and MEAN DAVID M. GORDON 2003

  • Corporations were faced with clear alternatives: Either they could revamp their managerial structures entirely, abandoning the structure of top-down control established after World War II, in order to forge the kind of cooperation and gain- and pain-sharing that might have smoothed the transition to an era of lower and falling profits; or they could deepen their reliance on top-down control and make up for the loss of worker incentives that falling wages imposed with an intensification of supervisory control.

    FAT and MEAN DAVID M. GORDON 2003

Comments

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.