neurologist's

Cindy Regan, the receptionist at the neurologist's office, told her best friend Anouri about the unusual case of Anna's cellphone.

Cellphone Girl (Part I) 2010

I sat there on the couch staring at him when we got back from the neurologist's office.

Shelley Hendrix Reynolds: Home Alone With Autism 2010

I sat there on the couch staring at him when we got back from the neurologist's office.

Home Alone With Autism Shelley Hendrix Reynolds 2010

Unfortunately, the Court did not note the date of the neurologist's examination of the plaintiff, and it's unclear whether his affirmation included that information.

First Department 2006

Assuming that the neurologist's exam occurred close in time to the preparation of his April 2005 affirmation (and that's a big assumption -- I wish the court had been clearer on that issue), based on the facts of this case, it makes sense that the plaintiff's neurologist's affirmation was inadequate in light of the failure to explain why he thought that the 2002 accident was the proximate cause of her injuries.

First Department 2006

Sixteen years ago I left a neurologist's office after my son was given this baffling diagnosis of world class proportions.

Barbara Fischkin: An Autism Mother Rages: Oprah Winfrey's Historic Autism Program 2008

I spent two months at Massachusetts General Hospital, whose doctors saved my life, and at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, where the neuropathy that had paralyzed my feet eased and I began, slowly and painfully, to learn to walk again despite a neurologist's opinion that I never would.

I Have Learned To Hope 2008

Unfortunately, the Court did not note the date of the neurologist's examination of the plaintiff, and it's unclear whether his affirmation included that information.

Personal Injury 2006

I'm glad there's someone like Janet amidst the three-ring circus of incompetents you've had to deal with. *shoots nasty look in Dr. Whatsherface the neurologist's direction*

On Dying and Living, and 18 days. Elizabeth McClung 2008

Assuming that the neurologist's exam occurred close in time to the preparation of his April 2005 affirmation (and that's a big assumption -- I wish the court had been clearer on that issue), based on the facts of this case, it makes sense that the plaintiff's neurologist's affirmation was inadequate in light of the failure to explain why he thought that the 2002 accident was the proximate cause of her injuries.

Personal Injury 2006