ti-guy

January 30, 2008 at 8: 20 pm ti-guy with the big words.

NATO Backs Canadian Demands « Unambiguously Ambidextrous 2008

Aeneas the Younger or Sir John (with respect), I was speaking of the Dave and ti-guy type lefty.

The Rise Of Feminism And The Fall Of The Family: Part 2 « Unambiguously Ambidextrous 2008

My guess is you and ti-guy, CC and Cameron and I will agree on very little.

Let me explain the word "dissent" to you, Mathew. CC 2009

Never will I forgive either of you, ti-guy and mgs, for all that mental imagery.

Let me tighten that up for you. LuLu 2008

MAKE UP YOUR MIND, BILL: As ti-guy points out, first-tier ID propagandist William Dembski is none too taken with John Derbyshire, but he has a curious objection:

Blind pigs and acorns: The Denyse O'Leary Chronicles. CC 2008

Omigawd, ti-guy - and here I almost fell for it, too.

And suddenly, the revelation turned ugly. CC 2008

Geez ti-guy, if you have money to burn, send some to me.

Getting sued? Yeah, it has its upside, I guess. CC 2008

Ya, ti-guy, someone with money goes in a pays for hookers.

Whoa ... someone feels neglected. CC 2008

The only problem with that comparison, ti-guy, is that no one would ever known when they are 'done'.

The delightful bidirectionality of logic. CC 2008

I didn't even realize that it gets even better, as ti-guy explains here:

The Canadian blogosphere libel frenzy: Get. Over. Yourselves. CC 2008