addendumb has looked up 15 words, created 2 lists, listed 417 words, written 16 comments, added 0 tags, and loved 12 words.

Comments by addendumb

  • Dunbar's number is suggested to be a theoretical cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships. These are relationships in which an individual knows who each person is, and how each person relates to every other person.1 Proponents assert that numbers larger than this generally require more restrictive rules, laws, and enforced norms to maintain a stable, cohesive group. No precise value has been proposed for Dunbar's number. It has been proposed to lie between 100 and 230, with a commonly used value of 150.2 Dunbar's number states the number of people one knows and keeps social contact with, and it does not include the number of people known personally with a ceased social relationship, nor people just generally known with a lack of persistent social relationship, a number which might be much higher and likely depends on long-term memory size.

    August 15, 2011

  • the other dude did it
    also soddi, some other dude did it

    January 2, 2008

  • September 16, 2007

  • rapid cooling of a solid to lock it into a metastable crystal structure by preventing low-temperature processes, e.g. phase transformations

    September 8, 2007

  • a miscellaneous collection
    probably a “jocular imitation of law Latin�?

    September 1, 2007

  • Denotes maiden name, e.g. Margaret Hilda Thatcher née Roberts.
    Pronounced "nay."

    August 24, 2007

  • with respect to

    August 22, 2007

  • POF

    August 13, 2007

  • Point of impact (German)

    August 13, 2007

  • In good faith

    August 13, 2007

  • It is often written in the abbreviated form: N.B.

    July 25, 2007

  • http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9114(196207)66:3<259:TIVC>2.0.CO;2-K&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage

    July 20, 2007

  • Edward Lear's Nonsense Recipe for Crumboblious Cutlets invites us to "Procure some strips of beef, and having cut them into the smallest possible pieces, proceed to cut them still smaller, eight or perhaps nine times." Some regresses do reach a natural terminator. Scientists used to wonder what would happen if you could dissect, say, gold into the smallest possible pieces. Why shouldn't you cut one of those pieces in half and produce an even smaller smidgin of gold? The regress in this case is decisively terminated by the atom. The smallest possible piece of gold is a nucleus consisting of exactly 79 protons and a slightly larger number of neutrons, surrounded by a swarm of 79 electrons. If you "cut" gold any further than the level of the single atom, whatever else you get it is not gold. The atom provides a natural terminator to the Crumboblious Cutlets type of regress. It is by no means clear that God provides a natural terminator to the regresses of Aquinas. -Richard Dawkins

    July 13, 2007

  • Ironic; said when a person doesn't have what he wants and we are happy for that.

    July 13, 2007

  • Very few former believers call themselves apostates and they generally consider this term to be a pejorative.

    July 2, 2007

Comments for addendumb

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.