from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition
- n. A combat aircraft designed to carry and drop bombs.
- n. One who makes and sets off bombs.
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
- n. A military aircraft designed to carry and drop bombs.
- n. A person who makes and detonates bombs.
- n. bomber jacket
- adj. Completely solid and secure, usually referring to some form of protective gear (n.b. the forms "more bomber" or "most bomber" are unusual).
from the GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English
- n. a military aircraft that drops bombs during flight.
- n. a large sandwich on a long crusty roll that is split lengthwise and filled with meats and cheese (and tomato and onion and lettuce and condiments); different names are used in different sections of the US.
- n. a person who drops bombs or plants and explodes bombs, especially surreptitously.
- n. a bomber jacket.
from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.
- n. a military aircraft that drops bombs during flight
- n. a person who plants bombs
- n. a large sandwich made of a long crusty roll split lengthwise and filled with meats and cheese (and tomato and onion and lettuce and condiments); different names are used in different sections of the United States
SECOND BASE: Although the rail-thin bomber from the Bronx, Alfonso Soriano, came within a whisker of joining the exclusive 40-40 club, Jeff Kent's production at the plate and in the field for the Giants was too much to ignore.
It turns out that the cashier girl was the red shirt sender and the bomber is actually the guy strapped with bombs.
This particular capability of the bomber is one of the reasons for maintaining a bomber force, and reinforces the need for continuing to provide some kind of bomber defence for the next few years.
Really, the matter of where someone stands on a trial for the underpants bomber is a pretty good acid test for whether someone deserves to be taken seriously in American politics.
The Uni-bomber is basically an anti-civilizationist/primitivist and an collaborator John Zerzan, in fact I think he still writes his ranting in prison.
This one-off thriller from 1999 is about a secret US plan to remove a German bomber from the glacier on which it crashed in 1945.
In their minds, the underwear bomber is clearly guilty (not that I am denying this), and so torture just allows us to skip over that stupid trial process.
Being a captured failed suicide bomber is clue enough to hold this guy, interrogate him, gather any other intelligence about the guy, and all before charging him or giving him rights.
If we had caught them before they killed themselves, should we have declared them enemy combatants on the grounds that “being a suicide bomber is the typical MO of Islamist terrorists”?
Being a suicide bomber is the typical MO of Islamist terrorists, especially those in Al Qaeda.