Definitions

from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

  • noun A contagious disease of freshwater fishes, caused by a ciliated protozoan (Ichthyophthirius multifiliis) and characterized by small white pustules on the skin and eyes.

from The Century Dictionary.

  • noun An abbreviation of ichthyology.
  • A form of I, the nominative of the first personal pronoun, in the southern dialect of early English, and occasionally found in the midland dialect.
  • A Middle English form of each.

from the GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English.

  • pronoun obsolete I.

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

  • pronoun personal, obsolete I.
  • noun ichthyology Ichthyophthiriasis, a parasitic infection of freshwater fish caused by the ciliate Ichthyophthirius

Etymologies

from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition

[Short for New Latin Ichthyophthīrius, genus name : ichthyo– + Greek phtheir, louse.]

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License

From Middle English ich, from Old English  ("I", pronoun), from Proto-Germanic *ek (“I”, pronoun), from Proto-Indo-European *éǵh₂ (“I”). See also ch-, I.

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License

Shortening of ichthyophthiriasis.

Support

Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word ich.

Examples

Comments

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.

  • International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

    March 30, 2009

  • Ah, the hideous memories come flooding back. The dreaded ICH E10 draft document ("Choice of Control Group in Clinical Trials"), where it was abundantly clear from the get-go that "harmonisation" was never going to be possible because of the FDA's obsessive love for placebo-controlled trials even in situations where such trials were clearly highly ethically dubious. As this latter position was espoused by regulatory agencies in Europe and Canada, the gulf between their position and that of FDA was fundamentally unbridgeable. Which left those of us in the pharmaceutical industry charged with reviewing draft after interminable draft of this freaking document in a Kafkaesque no-man's land.

    Bernhard Huitfeldt and colleagues sum up the disappointing nature of the final dog's breakfast of a "consensus document" here .

    March 30, 2009