Prolagus has looked up 15658 words, created 71 lists, listed 4922 words, written 6710 comments, added 1696 tags, and loved 38 words.

Comments by Prolagus

Comments for Prolagus

Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.

  • Just look in the █████--it should be right there.

    February 24, 2014

  • I █████ you.

    February 18, 2014

  • Thank you, Pro! I was thinking of you recently when I found myself looking through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trees. (Also, I had to explain casu marzu to someone recently.) <3 <3 I spelled casu marzu wrong just now, but it made me see that two of my less-than-threes were missing. Are they here now? Oh! They're not! I forgot about our secret way of sending messages!!!! <3

    December 5, 2012

  • How's life in █████?

    August 16, 2012

  • Thanks, I should have checked.

    May 23, 2012

  • Oh, and brackets around "Zeitmunity," please.

    March 29, 2012

  • I'm glad you visit often. :-)

    We could just start up some new threads--have you come across any interesting words lately? (You are good at finding ones that are iroquoisy.)

    March 29, 2012

  • I less than three you.

    March 27, 2012

  • Guys! You should really <3'limit how many messages you send. I think Wordnik combines multiples into one email notification to' be kind.

    January 13, 2012

  • When I think of you, I think cu<3'ltivated and thoroughly pleasa'nt.

    January 13, 2012

  • Hi! I hope your Friday 13th was <3' not in the least bit' unlucky.

    January 13, 2012

  • I (heart) <3' that I can send secret messages to' you, too.

    January 13, 2012

  • This was only <3 and an apostrophe...

    January 12, 2012

  • <3'

    January 12, 2012

  • (that was actually <3 x 3)

    January 12, 2012

  • <3 <3 <3

    January 12, 2012

  • ok, <3 and apostrophe. that is the issue.

    January 12, 2012

  • test 6
    it would be easier to <3 you back if it didn't STOP

    January 12, 2012

  • test 5
    it would be easier to <3 you back if it didn STOP

    January 12, 2012

  • test 4
    it would be easier to <3 you back if it didn't take me STOP

    January 12, 2012

  • test 3
    it would be easier to <3 you back STOP

    January 12, 2012

  • Oh, that worked!

    January 12, 2012

  • test:
    OK, there's something wrong with <3 in a sentence.

    January 12, 2012

  • OK, there's something wrong with "less than 3" in a sentence.

    January 12, 2012

  • test:
    it would be easier to <3 you back if it didn't take me 5 minutes just to find the comment section

    January 12, 2012

  • I wrote something like "it would be easier to (heart) you back if it didn't take me 5 minutes just to find the comment section"

    January 12, 2012

  • Where? Which part?

    January 11, 2012

  • This is NOT what I wrote!

    January 11, 2012

  • It would be easier to <3 you back, if it didn't take 5 minutes to find the "comments for" section...

    January 11, 2012

  • <3

    January 11, 2012

  • Pro, for your question about comments on tags, try writing Erin directly by email (erin (at) wordnik.com) -- if you haven't already.

    November 29, 2011

  • Pro, I just went to my own profile and changed my preferences in order to hide my lookups from "the public." The first time it didn't take, but the second time it did.

    November 29, 2011

  • :-)

    July 22, 2011

  • Thank you for your kind comments.

    At SUNY, you would have a different link to OED.

    June 27, 2011

  • Thanks for the input; I updated zeke.sikelianos.com

    June 27, 2011

  • Maybe you were thinking about my Geek Culture list?

    May 19, 2011

  • Thanks, Pro. I do poke my nose in from time to time. Hope you're doing well.

    May 9, 2011

  • Thanks pro--will check out the Twitter link thing tonight.

    May 7, 2011

  • Thanks much for those bug reports, they were super userful--the loop bug and profile link on mobile should be fixed.

    May 3, 2011

  • Just fixed the mobile login issue, I think--let me know if it's still giving you trouble.

    May 3, 2011

  • Hi Pro, no, absolutely not--I'm sorry I haven't been more responsive. A series of the issues you reported fell into the bermuda triangle zone where they weren't absolute showstoppers, nor were they two minute fixes, so I made a mental note to get to them and have been slow about it.

    Though coincidentally, I'm moving some new stuff into production later tonight, including fixes for a handful of the things you've mentioned recently. The mislabeled link when comments appear on word pages is fixed, and most embedded video should start working again too--we upgraded some internal components, and the new versions had stricter embedding policies, which I've adjusted.

    May 2, 2011

  • Arigato gozaimasu, bilby-san.

    May 2, 2011

  • Mine go unanswered. For months. Probably forever. And bilbies don't live a long time in captivity.

    Edit: 6 months. I realise I may be guilty of the odd nonce comment that doesn't require responding, but there are serious suggestions that have been sitting there for 6 months.

    May 2, 2011

  • Yes. You are.

    April 29, 2011

  • You are adorable.

    April 29, 2011

  • Howdy do to you, too. :-)
    Have you had anything exciting for breakfast lately?

    April 17, 2011

  • You cannot escape the charge that you have previously engaged in the amazing pastime that is IDENTIFY THE WORDIE.
    You are therefore prime target material for inviting to IDENTIFY THE WORDIENIK.
    The whole of the bit of Wordnik that joins in on this would be truly honoured should you participate this time round.
    Easily find the right page right now because it is currently the most commented on list shown on the Community page.

    April 14, 2011

  • Has anyone ever made a list of iroquoisy words?

    April 14, 2011

  • In answer to your comment at "brogan", asking where the proper name entries I had mentioned were, I entered the following:

    To Progasus: They were removed, along with my complaint (as it should). I am gratified to see that comments are attended to. However, in this case, although the capitalized entries were apparently blanket removed, the three citations one first sees are also useless for other reasons. Although I can appreciate that culling the caps is a practical approach, it is not a substitute for reviewing the examples.

    April 14, 2011